![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjoafCNG9yFMjpx6BttRJ0jCod8d4Lioq74qnmQIOLvRIrNs-WModKbPAMAjkJLNdb4O51TGWHf-E4grX3ctRfvOBfCUkUJ-hf9sFYPg1O9MtiuO6XqBp7eKxhEDyDUPxmuVxyxrh4Mp10/s200-rw/cdma_cheaper.jpg)
Of course, the benefit is the consumer. But why the CDMA operators to provide a very cheap price.
I remember that time at the end of 2002, investment to build a service infrastructure for the GSM operator persubscriber its required cost approximately 600 USD. Compare that time to CDMA-based infrastructure that is only 150 USD. Moreover the cost of the use of the frequency imposed by the Indonesian government for a frequency fixed wireless access, much cheaper.
Moreover, at this time, CDMA infrastructure investment is much cheaper, made to China, such as ZTE and Huawei, only around 8 USD per Subscriber.
Comments
Post a Comment